I went to the theatre
With the author of a successful play.
He insisted on explaining everything.
Told me what to watch,
The details of direction,
The errors of the property man,
The foibles of the star.
He anticipated all my surprises
And ruined the evening.
Never again!—And mark you,
The greatest Author of all
Made no such mistake!”
–Christopher Morley,
“No Coaching,” The Questing Spirit.
Living in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado is a unique, soul steeling experience. Last summer, while getting my mail on the mountain road one overcast afternoon, I felt a gray tunnel of clouds swirling overhead. BOOM! A deafening peel of thunder clapped right over my head, making me feel as though I were right in epicenter of the storm. I wasn’t under it, but in it. It was the difference between being a spectator and being a player.
Feeling this stormy sensation made an impact. An immediacy, a sobering closeness, a reminder of my own insignificance, but also a focus entirely off of me and immersed in the direct experience of nature. In some ways, I felt catapulted deeper into what praise and appreciation are all about. To appreciate beauty is not to do so as a distant bystander, but as a practitioner. At times when I’ve kept appreciation of nature, of people, or of God on the intellectual plane, at arms length, I have forfeited the true value and wonder of the experience.
When my family moved to a different state while I was in high school, I transferred from a German class in my old school that was taught in the traditional method—rote memorization and written assignments. In the new school, I plunged into a class where the teacher used the “Immersion Method” of language learning. Students were expected to converse in class, to be stretched by the constant strain of mental gymnastics—searching feverishly for vocabulary, verb endings, and grammatical structures to talk to each other and the teacher. Grace under pressure. I found it to be overwhelming, but became convinced it is the best way to learn a language. Appreciating God’s world is best done through the immersion method.
Author Ravi Zacharias, in his book Recapture the Wonder, writes that the first destroyer of wonder is anything that steals the mystery of life. Indeed, there is a legitimate place for mystery and enchantment, and to allow for them, to appreciate and even embrace them is not to destroy learning and knowledge. To the modern scientific mind, bent on finding quarks and strings and ultimate, all-explaining theories of everything, we shudder to think that there would ever be a legitimate place for the admission that we do NOT know something. The quest for ultimate meaning and explanatory theories is commendable, and many who have engaged in such a quest have admirably done so maintaining a sense of passion and wonder. However, our pop culture has grown, in the context of such advances, yawningly complacent where passion is concerned. I would argue that part of the beauty, majesty, and artistry of God’s world is its mystery.
I once read the transcript of a debate about the existence of God between a Christian philosopher and an atheist. The atheist, a brilliant microbiologist, boldly asserted that if he were to fashion the human body, he could design it to work more efficiently than it does. For example, certain organs, he insisted, do not function as smoothly as they could, and the appendix is still a deep mystery as to its purpose. The theist responded by affirming the possible truth of this observation. “But,” he replied, “your position assumes that efficiency is God’s highest value. What if it were not primarily efficiency, but artistry that God was after most?” Indeed. Our modern lenses are too steeped in analytical quantification and efficient mass production to appreciate the artistry around us.
Dave, I want to thank you for the thoughtful posted comment to my blog regarding “The immersion method.” Sorry it took me so long to reply, as I usually work with the sight only once per month, given my other life and ministry obligations.
First, I want to stress that I was not at all attempting to disdain science, the scientific method, or scientists in particular. I have indeed encountered scientists from various theological stripes who have an admirable sense of wonder and awe, readily admitting their lack of knowledge, but with a passionate desire to learn more. This kind of attitude is what I wanted to commend in the article. What I was trying to communicate was that our pop culture, immersed in the context of technological advances and scientific discoveries, has developed a yawning complacency about discovery and wonder. I will try to clarify this distinction on my posting, and I thank you again for pointing this out.
Second, you mentioned that religion has a way of blanketing the unknown with “god.” I know that institutional religion has had a history of doing this sort of thing. Yet, I would posit that it is not simply by virtue of it being religion that this is the case. This is human nature. In his book, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Thomas Kuhn, who is a respected philosopher of science and no Christian or religious apologist, pointed out that the institutions within science are full of unquestioned “dogma” as well that gets defended, with opponents rejected out of hand without consideration of evidence. This is not to scandalize science either, but simply to say that in all quadrants of life, we have to guard against this dogmatic smothering of truth-seeking and open, kind inquiry.
Anyway, Dave, I again appreciate your thoughtful and kind reply. Let’s dialogue more if we can… Blessings on your day